The battle going on in the US right now between the liberal left and the religious right results in a lot of rhetoric but little analysis. Are we seeing a fundamental philosophical shift in the mindset of the country, or are we experiencing a sort of sheepish phenomenon in which neither side has any philosophy at all? Baaaaa…
The past couple of decades has seen a series of ideological movements, all of which built on or contradicted existing ones. The spirit of the French Revolution aroused the idea that everyone can be anyone and that all men are created equal. From there we had the industrial revolution, communist revolution, fascism, existentialism, and Islamism, among others. Freedom has, in essence, given man the opportunity to be free from God, who, according to Christian fundamentalists in this country, is an oppressive, brutal dictator Who will send you to Hell for disobeying Him. Nevermind that Christ the philosopher rebel preached peace and love and forgiveness.
Back in the day, the church was an enforcer of intellect. Monasteries were centers of learning and progress. Today, the church in America seems to hinder intellect, as the religious right has no basis in rationality for some of its beliefs. There is no meaning behind the silliness of calling cartoon characters gay, for example. It’s almost as if this kind of fundamentalist Christianity in this country is more of an irrational paranoia, a kind of mental derangement rather than a belief system. I may have a fear of crime when I am walking home from work, but it is based on rationality, for I see crackheads on a daily basis and I see news reports on shootings three blocks from my house.
Perhaps the most anti-Christian movement was the existential movement. Camus made not-believing in god his religion. The anti-Christian rhetoric of the existentialists was not new, as Nietzsche had also made anti-Christianity an intellectual movement as a sort of precursor to the existentialists. However, the aftermath of the existential movement sparked a religious revitalization that we are witnessing today in the Islamic Revolution.
What am I talking about, you ask? Well, it’s no secret that the father of modern jihad, Sayed Qutb, was well versed in the Western existential movement. He was disgusted with materialism that he saw while living in the West, and he is search for meaning in life led him to a fiery version of Islam, a sort of anti-Christ in the realm of capitalism.
Read National Review’s article on Camus and 20th century clarity.
Hey, you forgot that Hitler was anti-Christian too. Be sure and add his photo to your athiestic hall of "fame."
ReplyDeleteAs an extra bonus for you athiestic lefttists, Hitler was pro gun-control.
He can be a two-fer in your pantheon of "great thinkers."
determine which are the sacred and which are the profane:
ReplyDeletehttp://treyjackson.typepad.com/junction/2005/04/a_good_friday_c.html
swEEt
Hitler was not anti-Christian. He collaborated with the churches. Remember when the Pope, peace be with him, had to apologize for the Catholic church's treatment of Jews at the time?
ReplyDeleteList of "great thinkers"? (The greek says political philosophy for those incapable of reading the script.) I haven't gotten around to posting Thomas Moore or Aquinous yet. I'm still searching for good sites.
ReplyDeleteWork in progress.
hmm... can't decide which is more profane- KFC's 8-winged birds, the PETA freaks, or the fact that the wingnut pundits use Terry Shiavo for politics.
ReplyDeleteLefties were all for giving her a morphine drip so she didn't have to suffer, but the righties would not have it.
check out the LA Times. Dean is going to use Schiavo as an "issue." I guess that blows your left-wing idea that Dems are to "pure" to use her as an issue.
ReplyDeleteWell, it's already an issue now, thanks to the "culture of lifers" and the GOP. The article says that the Dems are going to address the right to die issue, not Schiavo per se.
ReplyDelete